Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Clinton/Obama...

Okay, seriously. Our newspeople must be dumber than they look.
This whole Clinton/Obama thing they're "making" an issue out of... would one candidate's backers support the other?

If you support one candidate who's for health care for 'all Americans' -- no matter what the plan,
for drawing troops out of Iraq on an advanced timetable, and etc. which both of them did:

Why on GOD'S GREEN EARTH would you then back the candidate from the opposite party?

It's like saying, oh I loved all YOUR ideas, but even though your competitors are 98.9% the same, I think I'll change horses right now and go for ALL THE COMPLETELY OPPOSITE ideas. Just for the flipping heck of it.

Umm.. WHY would anyone do that?

Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?

2 comments:

ktjrdn said...

Beacuse Clinton's a scary bitch and people may not support her methods of getting what she wants. Seriously, she's ruthless.

The other way around theough? I don't know why Clinton's supprtors wouldn't switch to Obama. There's really no reason. That's why McCain hasn't a snowball's chance of beating Obama, but might actually race against Clinton.

Lil Mouse said...

I guess that shows the difference between the states and their feelings. around here there's serious doubt (in the media) whether either one could garner enough votes from the other's groups -- but of course in Obama's "home" state, I can see why it would be touted as such there. forget personalities...I actually care what these people STAND FOR... but if we want to go there -- i figure a president should be ruthless. look where having someone who ignores the recession and pansies around with the military instead of taking command gets us... either way, i'm hoping for a change!